MISSION STATEMENT

To form a unifying agora, where scholars from all academic fields of study will be given opportunity to air their view on the notion and reality of fear.

Wednesday 19 September 2018

DESH SUBBAS NOTION OF FEAR









THE INTERVIEW CHAT

1.       Tell us as much as you can about yourself.
I am Desh Subba, born in Dharan, Nepal. Since 1996, I have been living in Hong with family. As a writer and philosopher, I have written some novels, poems articles and books published by reputable local and International publishers. The names of my main line books in English are  
 
Philosophy of Fearism : Life is conducted,directed and controlled by fear 

The Tribemen's Journey to Fearless,  

Philosophyof Fearism East-West Dialogue (coauthor R. Michael Fisher),  

Fear, Law and Criminology ( coauthors are R.Michael Fisher and B. Maria Kumar)
I am the propounder of Philosophy of Fearism and founder “The Fearism Study Center Dharan Nepal”. I have been working in development of Fearism since 1999.

2.   How do you see the reality of fear?
Fear is a universal truth. It is part of human consciousness. Among the four parts of the mind, the Amygdale part is only responsible for fear. This part was first developed as part of the mind. An experiment was carried out by some United States scientist in mouse with regards to fear. They took out the Amygdale from the mouse through operation; it was recorded that the mouse lost the sense of fear. This was evident because the mouse can now freely go to the cat. But the walking steps of the mouse appeared like it was drunk. This stands to prove that taking the bodily part of the fear-mind off man, he becomes more or less like a consciousnessless being. Consciousness is not part of five main constituent sense organs of the body. It is a combination of multiple senses. That's why I normally say that, we don't have only five senses, we have multiple senses. Consciousness is not enough to be afraid. Our knowledge of fear depends on how the meaning was developed. Its meaning is important to the fear. I tried explaining this in caricature of meaning way. We used to caricature the meaning. When we caricature meaning, we caricature fear too. For example when we learn the meaning of ghost, we learn to be afraid too. If we don’t learn to be afraid of ghost then we would not fear ghost. Who used or created the meaning of ghost at the first time, he/she used it according to situation, event, environment, consciousness and conditional reflex etc. I described it in my book (2014). When we see new thing(s) or word we never directly fear. It is philosophically responsibility to attempt understanding it otherwise it will be taken normal and factual.
   The Conditional Reflex Theory of Russian Psychologist Ivan Pavlov's which was experimented on dog is a close and relevant example of my theory of meaning. I am taking it as my source of fear too.
3.       Mention at most five writers that influenced your line of thought and if possible, the central thesis of their view.
Authors and philosophers read many books and develop some new idea from it. These ideas also influence them. This is common place among philosophers or writers. My case is accidently different. Firstly, I coined the word "Philosophy of Fearism" and develop it. To develop it, I started to read related books. Mostly I used to read those books which are helpful in my philosophical writing and lecture. I read Nepalese version books because it is difficult for me to read English directly. Nepalese author who have written world literary theory, criticism and philosophy. I read many times book of Dr. Sanjeev Upreti, name of his book is "Talking About Theory." It is prepared for university text. But it is useful for me because what I required as references were found therein. This book discusses the theory of modernism and post modernism. I read the book of Dr. Govindraj Bhattarai's and many criticism books. I laid my hand on the "Introduction of Philosophy" written by Dr. Birendra Prasad Mishra which was useful too, "Outline of world book" written by Rahul Sankrityayan, Marxist Philosophy by V. Afanasyev etc. I read also some religious and spiritual books also I read. Currently, I am working on "The Holy Bible".
4.       Mention (if you know any) at least three fearologist or psychologist or sociologist you know who said something on fear and succinctly state their central thesis.
I read a Fearologist book by the Nigerian author Osinakachi Akuma Kalu "The First Stage of the Fearologist". He looked at  fear from  the Fearologist angle. He is the first to write a book exclusively with the title Feaology. I studied the book "East and West Literary Theory" by of Prof. Mohan Raj Sharma and Dr. Khagendra Luitel. In this book the views of many psychologists were availed - Sigmund Freud, Jacque Marie Emile Lacan, Alfred Adler etc. Freud and Lacan talked about castration. Frued ignored the importance of castration of father and Lacan believed that castration is as a result of language. Building on this backdrop, I think fear of father is most important thing here. Adler talks about Inferiority complex. My point is inferiority complex is as a result of fear. In sociology I studied Karl Marx, Michel Foucault and Antonio Gramsci. 
Karl Marx focus is class struggle. My argument is that there is no class struggle in society but fear struggle. Michel Foucault's Discipline and punishment is concerned with fear. The Hegemony theory of Gramsci is also connected to power and less power. Powerful person shows fear for the powerless person to take advantage. These are my subject of research.
5.       Do you think that fear is relevant to the society? If yes how relevant is it? If no why?
Yes fear is relevant to the society. If people have no fear of the rules and regulations, police, court, punishment, how can the society move forward? However, it must be used in a proper way. Misuse of fear invite problems and right track usage avoids violence, rape, killing, corruption etc. Our society, country, and family, school everywhere keep discipline as a result of fear. If there is no fear, one cannot tell what the society would look like. In my opinion fear is the best relevant tool to the society.  
6.       How can you explain fear from your own discipline?
In my own discipline, fear is a knowledge which derived from meaning. That meaning is a caricature design. This type of discipline design generates fear to us. This word, meaning is specially design to produce fear. This is one of an active and protective consciousness. After generating fear in our consciousness, our consciousness becomes active to manage it. Steps of managing it may be multiple. Philosophers, authors and leaders undermine its greatness and neglect it. In my discipline, fear is the central like sun in the solar system other factors are planets and planetoids. 
7.       How does fear affect the society man finds him?
Invisibly fear is plays a major role in our society. Creation, invention, construction, institution are in existence because of fear. Knowingly or unknowingly fear is in the centre of life. If we remove fear from our society, it will turn into life without breath. Just as breath is to life, so is fear to human society. Many scholars, leaders, and writers did good explicit and implicit work on fear especially when we dig inside their thought. From already existing philosophical and scientific literatures we can find fear like an electron, proton and neutron to the society. Fear has deep effect to our life, society and country.
8.       Is it true that when one is afraid, the spirit of fearlessness emerges also? How true is this statement?
It is like relation of disease and treatment. Without sickness or  disease one will never seek for the doctor or medicine. When someone is afraid, then that person seeks exit. This exit leads them towards invention, construction, development etc. Concept and root of government and political philosophy was based on fear and way to fearlessness.
9.       How best can humanity manage fear?
First of all education. We must start good fear education. Under fear education it will have many departments. Without good fear education humanity cannot manage fear. Fear education would be the most require practical education in coming days. We cannot ignore its importance. We need to look and take care of it in accordance to the ways given by Philosophy of Fearism, Philosophy of Fearlessness, Fearology and Philosophy of Fear. These concepts are very new concept. The world is suffering from fear disease in present time. Before mow it was not harmful as it is in the present day. Now it needs cure. The remedy is solely fear education. Every individual need to know what fear is? What its role is in our daily life? How the world is suffering as a result of fear and how the world is to be cured from fear? To understand researches or thesis based work, there should be scholars, critics, analyzers. To treat this increasing number of fear patients we need separate cure centers, doctors and medicines. This is the best way to manage fear.
  1. Do you think that philosophy of Fearism or fearology is going to be relevant to the humanity?
Yes definitely Philosophy of Fearism or Fearology is only the relevant tool to cure humanity from fear problems. Fearist authors are trying their best to propound the best theory for the sake of humanity.

Email;fearism@gmail.com
 Thanks so much sir.

No comments:

Post a Comment